Further Explanation
 

Shabby, don't worry, it can only be used in NCAA on 3rd and very long situations. I'm curious as to the specific verbage the NCAA uses vs. the HS level to prevent this.

I wouldn't be so harsh, it was a brilliant way to overcome bigger, stronger teams ala App. St. vs. Michigan or even boiled bases vs. out of the bag. Yeah, I went there! ;) NOTE: BEFORE ANYBODY GETS THEIR PANTIES IN A WAD....I've been there done that, so if you haven't, please refrain from replying because slamming boiling WAS NOT the point!!! thmbsp$

After doing some HEAVY research on the topic, I found another source that's not affiliated with the purchase of the system.

http://swsentinel.blogspot.com/2007/...1-offense.html

Here's A Site From The Ref's Pov.
 

GOOD STUFF! Even Refs fight and argue over certain topics!!! :rtfl:

http://forum.officiating.com/showthr...t=39748&page=2

Jimbo, I guess I am too "old school" to wrap my mind around this. I do respect your opinion though and thanks for the caveat about the "boiled Base" comment.

That seems to be a a topic that brings a knee jerk reaction from a lot of people.

Let's not go there on this post please, I agree.

Better Example
 

Here's another example: untweaked, out of the bag standard rookies vs. tweaked TTCs.

It is a hard concept to fathom. Even the Refs are yelling "heresy!" I'm only on post #30, but they are raising Cain over the subject. :rtfl:

LSU back in the mid to late 70''s ran an offense featuring 2 QBs in the
backfield. The only difference one of the QBs would lineup under
center the other at a tailback position whether in a full house
backfield or two man set. Off the pitch or handoff the other QB has
the option to run or pass. If you ran a veer the QB if he kept the ball
could take a step past where the FB ran through the line then follow
the FB. It forces the defense to cover more ground and less aggressive.$cch$