![]() |
Quote:
Many of the Proline dials sold from Miggle added to the convention shell always seem to tip the scale to 1.3.........That to my knowledge is what upped the weight to 3.3 instead of 3.2. Geno H |
Geno,
Thanks...was curious, that's all. Mark |
Quote:
Tudor's definitions need to be re-defined, or perhaps we need to add a new defintion, independent of manufactured "standard" figures that simply addresses total weight of base and figure; call it "competition weight" and the recognized limit is 4.0 g |
Thats whats up
its obvious that the standard manufactured products isnt going to change no time soon, we need to seperate the 2 "Competition Weight" addresses eveything we need to do here period. George is right the standards have been set awhile back & for new guys, thats where they will most likely start, assuming they go to the common manufactures for there products. With that said "Competition Weight" is what deserves our attention.;) pretend like that wasnt my suggestion for u guys who wouldnt follow me out of a burning house:D
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You know you are probably much more knowledgable than I in respect to weight classes. But the few tournaments I have been in were for the most part 4.0. This is where the hobby is going. The players perform much better in this weight class. As for the 3.3 team I'm preparing, I want to have them on hand just in case as was the case at the MFCA convention some coaches don't have a 4.0 team. As for me and leagues if its a 3.3 team or 4.0 then I can play in either. But believe me when I say some of the big heavy weights in this hobby are moving to the 4.0 weight class. I have tested both 3.3 and 4.0 on my board (3924) and there is no doubt they perform better at 4.0. Please Rip no disrespect just what I hav efound to be the case. RD |
eye on the ball
Quote:
|
I am making a Notre Dame team that is 3.2 and a Houston Oilers team with custom figures that is 4.0...no big deal.
|
ppcrn $br# ppcrn $br#
:fghttt: |
Why not simply create an official FAQ instead of official weight ?
Why not just create an official faq somewhere, taking count of each usual competition weights?
something like that, but with a "pro" (experienced) point of view : classic (3.2g-3.3g) : pro : work out of box (especially miggle sets/figs range, buzzball figs range) historic way of playing MF no need to add weight or modify bases or figs cons : can be "bouncy" or inconsistant on some big boards a lot of leagues preferes 4.0gram class list of leagues playing under classic class : (...) heavy : (4.0g) pros : more "room" for customizing works better on some big boards a lot of leagues plays 4.0grams class cons : heavy class athletes can be too strong against classic class athletes, causing incompatibility need to watch out the weight during the team setup (customizing or training) list of leagues playing under heavy class : (...) etc, etc... you get the idea. Lets the beginners make their own point reading that official faq and watching 1) the material they have/plan to buy 2) the leagues and friends they can play with around, without any "that is better than this" argument, peacefully (Lennon, go out of this body now). In my opinion (beginner oriented, of course), it should be usefull. Remember some examples we saw on that topic : the slot cars, the model railroad, the sport gun competition, etc, etc... other hobbies or sports with many diferent sides/scales/etc... in them always choosed that way, instead of saying THAT is the official something. thmbsp$ |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.