View Single Post
  #4  
Old 02-07-2010, 02:34 PM
sweetka's Avatar
sweetka sweetka is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,697
Thumbs up Like I stated initially gentlemen. . .

It's not a debate. Those bases are good enough to compete with any base period. There is not such a considerable drop off that I would pay 10 bucks for one when I can get eleven for a dollar more and compete. It may require a little more work and detail but it should if your teams are competing at a high level.

Joe, your problem is the same as mines. I would probably have won three Great Lakes, at least one or two Miggles if I could pass better. Talentwise, not a problem.

I told the truth regarding the bases in my initial post on that thread. I got a call from a coach who disagreed. I feel that I proved, beyond a shadow of a doubt, my point on their field. I tweaked the base right there for the most part. I attempted to bring a rational unbiased approach to the merits of the base.

So far I have tweaked three rounded fronts. One noseguard, one receiver, and one tight end. I screwed up the tight end but the noseguard and receiver would easily start on most all the teams in this league if the coach doesn't have a bias. I repeat, these bases are good. I don't give a hoot what anyone else thinks because they will find out soon enough.
__________________
If all my friends were to jump off a bridge, I wouldn't jump with them, I'd be at the bottom to catch them
Reply With Quote