View Single Post
  #83  
Old 02-21-2010, 02:21 PM
Treks1's Avatar
Treks1 Treks1 is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waterford, MI (the "W")
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megawattz View Post
If u use the phrase "Competition Weight" instead of "Standards" I believe everyone here would agree. The standards are in place with regard to manufactured products, thats not gonna change no time soon. As far as "Competition Weight" thats really whats this about. 4.0 is the preferred "Competition Weight" for stated reasons, that doesnt mean standards have to change.
Ok... then if the "standards" were based on "standard" sets of figures and base the perhaps we do need to change the terminology. Perhaps "Competition Weight" is the term we should be using, as I don't believe the the question raised by the poll had anything to do with "standard figures".

Tudor's definitions need to be re-defined, or perhaps we need to add a new defintion, independent of manufactured "standard" figures that simply addresses total weight of base and figure; call it "competition weight" and the recognized limit is 4.0 g
__________________
SPARTANS!!! WHAT IS YOUR OCUPATION?!!!
Reply With Quote