[detroitchild]

To Wolf's point, I think that the people here have various view points as to what setting specifications are all about. For some odd reason I believe that there are a few who feel like standards are being forced on us. I'm pretty sure that is not the case. My take is we are putting together documentation for new or returning hobbyist WHILE creating standards that these hobbyist can use as a starting point IF they so choose. It appears that we are also creating standards for MFCA sanctioned events (Wolf, correct me if I'm wrong on any of these points).

That being the case we should be clear when we are defining something. For instance, any documentation for new/returning hobbyist should loosely define that boards range from a Tudor 500 sized board to a full scale sized board and the sizes in between. If we are setting standards for MFCA sanctioned events then we could say that the minimum is a Tudor/Miggle 620 (or whatever) board although it may be recommended to use a bigger board for optimal play experience (that's just an example guys...don't get your undies in a bunch).

Your thoughts?