View Single Post
  #30  
Old 02-24-2010, 08:41 AM
Joeram57's Avatar
Joeram57 Joeram57 is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Woodstock, Ga
Posts: 795
Default "Paralysis by analysis"

To the original question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RavennaAl View Post
What do you feel should be classified as the minimal regulation size for a board?
I would say 620...

And to Coach RIP,[ "Paralysis by analysis" the newbies get sooooo bogged down with the "so many ways/things" many walk away before they even get started.]

You hit the nail on the head...That is unfortunately, ME, just my nature, in everything I do, no one to blame but myself, haven't walked away yet, however, this morning I am seriously considering it, once again, NO ONE's fault, just my "nature" which may not be conducive to this hobby. It may just not be for me. It will be a tough decision as I enjoy it so much, however, on the other side of the coin, it can be over whelming, while trying to work, take care of Family needs, etc, etc, if one let's it get to that point and I let it...

My apologies for going off subject, however, RIP's "Paralysis by analysis" kinda just hit home...and to re-iterate, it's my current work environment (24x7) and MY personality that is the prob...like my wife has been saying for 31 years,must "suc" to be you.

THE MFCA IS GREAT AND SHOULD CONTINUE ON IT'S PATH, ONLY GOOD COMES OUT EVERYTHING THESE GUYS DO...and Oh yea, 620, minimal board size
__________________
Joe Ram
"If you're not livin on the edge, you're takin up too much space"

Last edited by Joeram57 : 02-24-2010 at 08:51 AM. Reason: Spelling
Reply With Quote