Quote:
Originally Posted by FrustratedFinFan
I think there should be multiple rule sets proposed and then a vote by all MFCA members to pick the set used. I don't like having a single regional rep given powers over all. I might even join MFCA for that...I donated first year, but really have been kind of turned off by the power struggles.
|
I agree with u Fin, the power struggles is the very reason this isnt done already, our problem isnt who, but how. Already were changing the original concept into what we feel can work. Sometimes letting the solutions reveal themselves, & concentrating on the mechanism to make that happen is over looked, you cant have a builing without a foundation. First off, we have guys working on rules & dont even know who there making rules for, secondly anything u do requires members, u might want to start by contacting those "HEADS OF STATE" who have the info on who attends there tournaments. Build a concensus first without that its going to fail, get your chips in order. Third, let the Market decide how it wants to play, either by Conference or vote as Rick & Fin has suggested again, funny the west coast guys are the only ones involved with this discussion, if u want there support I suggest u listen. the MFCA should be an Organizer at this point, drawing all parties involved into a meaningful discussion about how this can be done, structered around "Existing dates & Tournaments" for these are when we gather. RULES ARE NO WHERE NEAR THE TABLE YET, as they are the 1 thing that will turn guys off, build your support first then rules through concensus!