I truly feel that the MFCA should completely wash its hands on the rules issue, I truly see no gain as an Organization or to the Mission Statement, to continue on a noble but such devisive issue. Any attempt to wright policy or rules by definition, will serve to devide not unite, the hobby by area, style & or location. Personal relationships within the hobby & board members could also be viewed as a conflict of interest for there setting policy for events that they themselves may participate in. There are real, better yet, true reasons, why we have this discussion every year. Take the rules out of your hands free your minds fellas, if the MFCA were to function as a sanctioning body as far as rules, rattifyng rulesets on a yearly bases. let the parties involved set there own collective policy on rules, u guys choose the time & place then declare the winner. No charges of being biased, no personal tiffs, with different regions saying we did our best, only then will u get true support as they will know no personal bias. we must all understand the language also needs to change. to continue down the same path is what?
To choose to sanction rules on a yearly bases will provide the MFCA with the flexibility to review its operations & make changes when neccessary, as rules often change, its the foundation we need, rules come & go. First thing Shabby stated was under what circumstances he wouldnt participate!
WE IN TROUBLE!
