View Single Post
  #36  
Old 01-17-2008, 04:20 PM
kotixblack's Avatar
kotixblack kotixblack is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gardena, CA
Posts: 441
Default Then, Boiling Should Be By Choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetka View Post

Boiling bases is another choice we work around because people got tired of the awful smell, short shelf life during boiling. Add the fact that tweaking is just as effective with longer lasting results, then you have our position.



And we customize!
If tweaking is just as effective wilth longer lasting results then, why is boiling so tabu? I don't know about others, but I still have to tweak my bases after boiling them. I am not familiar with an overwhelming bad smell associated with boild bases. Other than the smell, I would think that boiling would be up to each individual coach. Also, I'm just an advocate of not banning a particular practice just because I don't like it or use it. I think each coach should be able to utilize his strengths as long as it is within the rule set. I used to boil for power and strength, but with the advent of new equipment, I more so boil for speed and smoother running men. Ken, you and many others witnessed me tweaking a unboiled proline, and making it stronger than one of my strongest boiled players at the convention in Chicago, when the Prolines first came out (Klingbeil asked how did u do that, & I gave a demo). That is why you would be suprised to find out which positions have boild bases on my squad. I feel you on some of the pains, trials, and tribulations of trying to boil for strength. I have purchased up to 10 packs of bases to find 3 out of 222 to make the Offensive/Defensive Line, LB or TE. Far too much work. In building my teams today, I find maybe 45%-50% of them to have boiled bases on them. I just don't want to loose the option.
Reply With Quote