View Single Post
  #7  
Old 02-05-2007, 11:41 AM
THE PEOPLE'S CHAMP
 
Posts: n/a
Default It is criminal that Monk is not in...

But it is not Michael Irvin's fault that the reporters are jerks so let's not take cheap shots at him. He should be in (and I am not saying he deserves to be in over Monk before someone yells at me for that.) Hercshel Walker deserves to be in there but will probably never get a sniff of the "Hall of Shame". And I am not a Cowboy fan before anybody says that is the only reason I am saying this. That's right, I know how you think. That's right.

These voters contradic themselves all of the time when it is to the benefit of their favorites. If a guy has boderline numbers and championships they say it is all about numbers. If a guy Has gaudy numbers and no championships they say it is about winning. Monk has both but because he was not "media friendly" he has to suffer. I feel as though the "Hall" has no credibility whatsoever because of this. Lynn Swann has to wait thirteen years to get in because he retired "too early" for them, Nick Bonuconti (sp) is in but Harry Carson has to wait soooooo long because he didn't have a son who got paralyzed. Carson is waaaaaay better than Bonuconti, Walker has better numbers than Gale Sayers (and I know people are going to throw six TDs in my face but by that logic Timmy Smith with 202 super Bowl rushing yds should be in also). John Riggins is in but not his best blocker Russ Grimm (also criminal). I could go on but I'm just saying the "Hall" is a bunch of bull crap.
Reply With Quote