View Single Post
  #10  
Old 04-06-2009, 11:36 PM
HOOP's Avatar
HOOP HOOP is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WHITE PLAINS, NY
Posts: 1,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony D Burgess View Post
When it comes to a system for the bullet pass, a 1 yard stick would be abused by the user.

When it comes to the flaws of the system, believe it or not, the flaws come from the user.

When the user tries to change what he or she doesn't fully understand this leades to issues or flaws.

Remember this was not built over night. The key is pracrice! The key is thinking! Failer to do these will show as a flaw.

One coach could not stop the out route, he kept running the same formation, and kept getting beat.

So after about 3-4 plays the coach said the system was flawed, but then I showed him all he had todo was shade his DB to the outside of the WR, and slide his OLB over to the outside. This shut down the out route!

The thing that guys have got to understand is that all is needed is for them to just play football and try not to question why this is this and that is that.

So with what you are saying, that brings me back to my question of last week.

Do you stick to the design of the play while you are running stoppages? (NFL)
or,
Do you deviate from the play if you see an open spot somewhere else? (EF/MF)

Even if the second is true, i dont see at as bad or a deterent. I only mentioned flaw, because the system is based strictly on real football play. But once someone breaks off their originally intended route and runs another because i different part of the field looks open, then either that is a flaw, or it just said to be allowed, therebye not being a flaw.

But let me explain that, by no means am here to argue whether orn not there are flaws of the system. if there are, or not, i still totally like the system. i just had that question last week and what was posted by Dre, contradicted what is preached by you. Not at all calling out, but just trying to figure out.
What i really wondered was, is breaking off a route even allowed?
Is there an integrity factor that a coach must continue to run the play designed until there is a total breakdown? Not design the play to run IN routes, but then on stop #2, you say "wow, the OUT route is wide open, let me go there instead". Again, if that is the case, then that is not real football cause wr's dont do that unless it is some sort of called option route from the huddle.
If a coach does do this, then that is a Board Game factor that cant be helped. Thats what i meant. So perhaps, using the word flawed was either too strong, or just the wrong word. i dont want any of this to get confused by that implied accusation, cause again, i just wanted an answer to the question. I thought i got it last week, but now it seems like its different.

WHICH IN THE BIG SCHEME OF THINGS IS FINE.

But again, the posting by Dre that started this thread was excellent. I dont anything else to kinda hijack that intended idea behind the posting. I like and agreed with all of it, but that one small point. And it is no biggy at all anyhow.

[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]GO CAROLINA.[/color] WON 2 NCAA
POOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



gOODNIGHT yALL, SWEET DREAMS, Lunch is on me tomorrow

sCOTT
__________________
Does my post promote miniature football in a positive or fun way?
Does my post positively support my league, my fellow coaches and the hobby?
Does my post show to others my good fellowship and strong integrity?
Reply With Quote