|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CEFL Photo Essay: Chapter V – The PAC Ten Conference
Heading into Round 4 the PAC Ten was all about USC. USC was 3-0 and hadn’t really been challenged heading into its game with Cal (2-1). UCLA was fresh off an impressive dominating victory against Army, who had just defeated a #1 Nebraska team in its prior game. All indications pointed to a showdown in Round 5 between USC and UCLA for all of the marbles.
But first USC had to deal with a pesky 1-loss Cal team. Cal had been flying below the radar after losing its first game to Notre Dame in Round 1, with USC and UCLA getting all of the attention, even though Cal had managed a win against UCLA in Round 2. Cal wasn’t flashy. It has a below average offense, but a trend was developing across the CEFL: defensive teams were beginning to rise to the top of the rankings. Cal had quitely developed a top 5 ranked defensive squad. The PAC Ten was turned upside down when USC’s flashy offense was shut out 7-0 by Cal. Cal used a balanced ground and air attack to manage the field on offense and held USC to 46 total yards (51 rushing, -5 passing) in the game. Suddenly, Cal, with victories over both USC and UCLA had rendered the final USC/UCLA showdown meaningless if it could defeat 1-3 Oregon in Round 5. UCLA defeated USC early on in Round 5, leaving UCLA 4-1 and hoping for a Cal loss. Since Cal had lost its out of conference game, UCLA could still win the PAC Ten Championship if Cal ended up with 2 losses. Cal had trouble moving the ball against Oregon, but managed a modest 7-0 win, thanks to Cal’s defense, which had now risen to the #2 defense in the land with successive shutouts. Cal was the PAC Ten Champion!!! The Bowl Comittees now had an interesting dilemma. Navy and Notre Dame, each 5-0 would be invited to a bowl game. But which of the two conference champions would join them? Auburn was the first odd-man out, because it had 2 losses and Michigan, Colorado and Cal were each 4-1. The Orange Bowl Committee decided that Cal was in, because its only loss was a very close 3-0 game with 5-0 Notre Dame in which Cal suffered from 2 interceptions. Colorado’s argument was that its only loss was to 5-0 Navy. With a 14-0 score, it was a more substantial loss than Cal’s loss to Notre Dame. Michigan’s only loss was to 2-3 Illinois, but was primarily the result of a quirky fumble. The Committees directed Michigan and Colorado to play each other for the final Bowl invitation. After Michigan defeated Colorado 10-0 in the extra game, Michigan received an invitation to the Sugar Bowl. Thus, the table is set: Sugar Bowl: Michigan vs. Notre Dame Orange Bowl: Cal vs. Navy Winners to play in CEFL Rose Bowl III |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
where did you get the helmets??
Great looking teams you have there. However, I wanna know where you got those mini helmets for the college teams??
Thanks K-Lo |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
COOP,
Who made the field? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
K-lo you can get the
Helmets at a sports collectible store, sometime k-mart or Wal Mart will have them too.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
here's where
they are called pocket pros.i have all the pro and college teams.i bought mine at a spoting goods hat store called the lid,you by the college ones by the conference and the pro by nfc and afc conference also.they are about 20.00 a conference for college and about 25.00 a conference for the pros
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Here Ya Go Lo!
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
can u help.
were did u get your decals from on usc i do need some. were can i get some at. Im new to efl in maryland befl. coachk
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I see u Dan
Whats up Dan i see u finally made it to the board welcome.I see u got skillz, looking forward to one day bringing my Bucs in to town .keep keepin up peace.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Figures were painted by Beenutt (dark jerseys) and Roo (light jerseys).
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
K-lo to all who responded about the helmets - Big Thanks! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|