SOLITAIRE VS TRADITONAL LEAGUE

[mantaraydre]

QUESTION,

More and more coaches seem to be happy playing solitaire. Itf they can devise a system where gameplay is just as or more exciting than dealing with league play. THEN WHY DO THEY NEED A LEAGUE /

Thats a major question for many, WHY DOES THE SOLITAIRE COACH NEED YOU SITTING ACROSS FROM HIM ? What can you offer him that he already mastered himself playing alone ? With charts it is like playing against someone else. Only difference is he must set up both teams ?

Why does he need to ride in your mercedes when he pulled up at a red light in a B M W.

Does the solitaire coach need you, or do you need him to fill up your league ?

of course some will experience the best of both worlds.

One advantage any solitaire coach has over any league is he can play exactly how he wants without any interference from disgruntled employees.

Solitaire is all about the set up first, then the actual execution regarding managing a league.

The set up itself is a process like building a house. but once it is done, you enjoy living in it.

The notion of i beat you or you beat me does not excite some coaches. THEY JUST WANT TO SEE THERE TEAMS RUN UP AND DOWN THE UNDER THERE WATCH !

So, with that said, which do you prefer ?

Why haven't you set up a solitaire league if it is in the back of your mind.?

do you think it is respected enough ?

Through dice and playcharts and playbooks. you can play any former or CURRENT NFL coach under your system. You can play

1) jimmy johnson this week and vince lombardi the next

or

2)play 2 coaches in a local league who's playbook may not be as extensive.

In other words, what is the bigger challenge

1)a coach with strong bases and some plays

or

2)some suprise play pulled from a chart you never saw before


which one is more enticing to you personally ?

mantaraydre