|
|
|
#31
02-10-2011, 05:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The most in depth way you could do it is average out the QB accuracy rating vs the defenses pass defense rating...
Say Peyton Manning has a 66% completion rate, and he is playing the Bills who give up a 62% completion rate then you would set his midrange completion chance at 01-64 (the average of the two numbers) and then adjust by 20 for longer or shorter passes as they discussed. Wouldn't be tough if you looked up the numbers, I don't think. That's how I would do it anyways.  Quote:
|
|
#32
02-10-2011, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
With some one like a Manning it wouldn't be hard, just time consuming, to get his numbers vs. each team. He's played every body multiple times, especially inter division/conference opponents.
__________________
Drk Mustang Football
|
|
#33
02-10-2011, 06:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ya I wouldn't bother getting a QB's numbers vs each team. just a season average and then the defenses season average.
|
|
#34
02-10-2011, 06:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Already one ahead of you FOTH ... this is what I posted earlier in the thread:
COMP. INC. INT. TEAM 01-66 67-96 97-00 OHIO STATE 01-66 67-98 99-00 KENTUCKY 01-65 67-98 99-00 OKLAHOMA 01-63 64-97 98-00 FLORIDA STATE 01-63 64-96 97-00 MICHIGAN 01-61 62-97 98-00 FLORIDA 01-59 60-96 97-00 VIRGINIA 01-59 60-96 97-00 TEXAS 01-59 60-97 98-00 NEBRASKA 01-56 57-95 96-00 ILLINOIS 01-56 57-98 99-00 SYRACUSE 01-56 57-95 96-00 PURDUE 01-56 57-96 97-00 CLEMSON 01-55 56-97 98-00 BYU This is by team passing numbers. I can't do it by individual quarterback, because each team in my league only has 1, and in some cases, like at Purdue (Marve) and BYU (Nelson), the quarterbacks got hurt at some point in the season and never returned, so their stats weren't completed. As you can see, it's a big difference with Pryor throwing for Ohio State or Hartline throwing for Kentucky, compared to Parker throwing for Clemson or the backups throwing for Purdue and BYU - backups who both figure largely into those percentages. Ed   
__________________
GO PITT!!!
|
|
#35
02-10-2011, 06:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Up to you.
These are all great ideas. Once again you can make your charts as simple or as sophisticated as you like. I keep my QBs equal across the board because any QB could have a bad game or a great game any given game. Sometimes running backs with great bases get shut down by a good defense or turned by team mates. I really don't want one team to have an advantage over any other team but that's just me. We are all innovators, designers, and thinkers. Trial and error is a great learing tool. You or I may create something that really does not work well during the game so you simply throw it out. At every level of football whether on the fields outside or the electric gridiron we play on Rules are made to be changed. It's up to you coaches to do what fits right for your league.
|
|
#36
02-10-2011, 07:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
With 3 quarters down in my game under the new charts system, the first thing I might do is go from 40 back to 45 minute quarters. I've run 19, 19, and 17 snaps (only counting plays I lined up, not fair-caught punts, PATs, etc.) in the three quarters. Would like to get that number back in the low 20s and adding 5 minutes would do that.
Going to keep it 40 for the last quarter of Syracuse-Clemson, though, just to keep it fair. 'Cuse ahead now, 17-7. Ed
__________________
GO PITT!!!
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
) All your calculations are as a whole, but do you care that Peyton would pass better than the browns QB, whoever that would be. Like if you are playing with a great passer, should his chances/chart be different than that of a bad passer? 
Linear Mode
