My proposal to the BOD for Weight Class definitions-final input here

[mantaraydre]

WOLF,

I just thought Al had a great point regarding 2 seperate classes for 3.3. I did not understand it either and was asking the quesh as such.
Your write up is the greatest and i do not want to see another one. Your right, im playing 4.0 and above so i will let the 3.3 coaches enjoy what they do. Just wondering why there was a seperation.

wolf, please pass this bill in congress by friday 5:00. It's no need to prolong the situation.

If no names were decided on,

1) 1ST AND 10 (3.3 STOCK)

2)2ND AND 5 (3.3 CUSTOM)

3) 4TH AND GOAL ( 4.0 AND UNLIMITED)

Wolf, thanx for the great write up. The die has been cast. LETS PASS THE BILL AND TACKLE THE NEXT PHASE.


MANTARAYDRE

[Michigan Joe]

Great job on the thread everyone...the competition categories is the way to go and I have NO DOUBT that the members of the MFCA will step up and help define and educate anyone who is interested in learning. I have teams in both 3.2 and the 4.0 but not everyone will. Is everyone interested in trying 4.0...No. Will some that have played 4.0 ever be interested in going back to 3.3...No (and thats fine). However the MFCA is a leader in this hobby and its great to see 4.0 being recognized by the members as a top notch competition class!

Weight addition is is the great equalizer allowing competition of various equimpent both new and old, standard or custom. I love that in the 4.0 weighted class you can play a light Tudor teams vs. FF.net teams, or a buzzball team vs. Egridiron team, or a rookie base can compete with a TTC at the same weight! I have no doubt that innovation will flourish in this weight category.