#1
|
||||
|
||||
FG Kicking Chart
Just threw this together using the NFL %'s Could come in handy for people that are not able to physically use a kicker. I've based it on percentile dice (aka. two 10 sided dice) so if you already use "the box" you should already have the dice in it.
Hope it helps someone! FG Chart Using % dice Code:
Code:
Last edited by Hoop27 : 01-22-2011 at 10:29 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting. I may give it a try.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
i like that chart. but im a simpleton, is there a way to transfer these numbers to 2- regular dice, the 6-sided kind?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
sorry Mark. Not really. At least not with any semblance of accuracy. But since I'm a such a wonderful person (LOL) I'll see what I can do for you. Give me a few minutes to BS the numbers.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Alright Mark. It's the best I can BS for ya. I had to simplify it down to good or miss. It's not quite as accurate but it's close!
Using two 6 sided dice Code:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
wow. thanks. i may give it a try on my tudor classic championship solitaire 2010 tourney tommorow.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Ver interesting
chart Shane. I may try this every once in a while when I don't feel like hopping up and actually kicking the ball.
Reg |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Love it
Simply love it.....with the passing stick and your kicking chart, we're on business without the TTQB (for those who play solitaire).
Thank you again and have a great day Benster
__________________
Ben Racette Montreal, QC, Canada |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Let's Look at Passing ...
This is good work, Hoop, and something I'm going to seriously consider implementing into my ECFA and EPFA play.
I've been doing a lot of thinking and calculating today with regard to passing accuracy and how it relates to electric football. Through the games I've played in the ECFA, the throws I actually make hit about 2/3rds of the time. The completion percentages for the QBs are lower than that, of course, due to throw aways and Box-induced incompletions and interceptions. Based on the dice rolls, when you shake the box there is roughly a 3% chance of the pass being incomplete. I've added a rule where if this double 2s dice roll comes up, another dice roll is done and if they total 2 or 12, the pass is intercepted. However, in the grand scheme of things, this chance was very low. I've also not had many penalties, so I might jack that possibility up, and I came up with this: Double 1s: Fumble Double 2s: Incomplete Double 3s: Intercepted Double 4s: Minor Penalty Double 5s: Minor Penalty Double 6s: Major Penalty I've decided against using injuries for now, so I'm not accounting for them on the chart. Now, here's another way to deal with passing. In research I've done today, NCAA Division I-A quarterbacks completed 59.7% of their passes (roughly 60%) during the 2010 season. The average team had 12 passes intercepted in 374 throws. Put to two 10-sided dice, this would read: 01-60 COMPLETE 61-97 INCOMPLETE 98-00 INTERCEPTED Sounds simple, right? But here's the problem. This assumes that every pass is the same - that your receiver who is open 55 yards down field has the same chance of catching the ball as the running back in the flat just 10 yards away from your quarterback. This shouldn't be. To me, the short passes should be easier and the longer passes should be harder, so you'd have something like this: 0-20 yards: 01-70 COMPLETE 71-99 INCOMPLETE 00 INTERCEPTED 21-40 yards: 01-50 COMPLETE 51-97 INCOMPLETE 98-00 INTERCEPTED 41-yards plus: 01-30 COMPLETE 31-95 INCOMPLETE 96-00 INTERCEPTED Remember, the majority of the passes likely to be thrown are going to be in that first category, so the lower completion opportunities at longer distances shouldn't distort the overall completion percentage of a quarterback too greatly from that original 59.7% number. I even went through, and based on 2010 stats, produced chart unique to each of my 14 teams: COMP. INC. INT. TEAM 01-66 67-96 97-00 OHIO STATE 01-66 67-98 99-00 KENTUCKY 01-65 67-98 99-00 OKLAHOMA 01-63 64-97 98-00 FLORIDA STATE 01-63 64-96 97-00 MICHIGAN 01-61 62-97 98-00 FLORIDA 01-59 60-96 97-00 VIRGINIA 01-59 60-96 97-00 TEXAS 01-59 60-97 98-00 NEBRASKA 01-56 57-95 96-00 ILLINOIS 01-56 57-98 99-00 SYRACUSE 01-56 57-95 96-00 PURDUE 01-56 57-96 97-00 CLEMSON 01-55 56-97 98-00 BYU The other part to consider is, and I haven't worked up charts or done the research on this yet ... but how did teams do defensively stopping the pass, to the point that it would affect the offensive team's ratings? If Oklahoma is 1-65 on completions, but face an Ohio State team that, for example, only allowed 45% completions by opposing passers during the season, does the number get adjusted to 1-55? Not sure how deep I'd want to get into that. I don't know if I'm going to use these charts in my solitaire game play or not. I like using the TTQB to throw the football. But in the effort to speed up gameplay, I could probably play 40-minute quarters instead of 60-minute quarters by using some version of the passing charts above, along with the FG chart already included above in this thread. Ed
__________________
GO PITT!!! Last edited by RooMorgans : 02-08-2011 at 03:44 PM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Ed I really think you are onto something with the completion ratio to the length of the pass. I may give it a shot.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|