[Anthony D Burgess]

Thanks a lot . I am not realy optimistic on something being geanerally understood by all as this is an invintation to issues.

With respect to rules as they are it should not leave anything to geaneral interpretation as some are not ethical when it comes to following rules.

Definitions must be made clear and not left up to " Geaneral interpretation "

Example: Fumble: A fumble is any act, other than a pass or legal kick, witch results in loss of player possession. The term Fumble always implies possession.

This closes all loop holes and there is no gray area as to what a fumble is, knowing that there can be no fumble without possession, no possession of a ball is a " Muff ", and that is by rule the touching of the ball by a player in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain possession.

If this hobby wants to gain the respect that we all think it need, then the rules need to be clear with no assumptions to geaneral interpretation.