Miniature Football Home  

Go Back   Miniature Electric Football Forums > Miniature Electric Football Tailgate Party
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-14-2010, 10:56 AM
wayneinsf's Avatar
wayneinsf wayneinsf is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 62
Default Choice of QB

We use da pill in SF with no problems remember the coach still has to complete the pass and we have had a coach complete 90% and we had a coach complete 1% of passes using da pill. The biggest issue was the choice of QB. The coaches in my league voted not to use the newer TDQ because it was unfair to those who have used the older standard tudor/ miggle QB's all the time. So we only use the standard QB's for league games and that can be a challenge.
__________________
Big Hap in Oak- Town by way of Chi- Town


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2010, 11:40 AM
mozeek's Avatar
mozeek mozeek is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MONROE, N.Y.
Posts: 2,087
Default

Ok I WILL say that the rules state the pill is not allowed. That is the only reason. That's in our League which you helped start. I feel disrespected often by some of your posts because it appears directly aimed at a league that you helped to start and also endorsed in the beginning. I apologize if I have unknowingly Done something to offend you.
__________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead, where there is no path and leave a trail." http://www.leaguelineup.com/welcome.asp?url=bamfl
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2010, 09:19 PM
Geno H's Avatar
Geno H Geno H is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Raymond Kansas
Posts: 1,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayneinsf View Post
We use da pill in SF with no problems remember the coach still has to complete the pass and we have had a coach complete 90% and we had a coach complete 1% of passes using da pill. The biggest issue was the choice of QB. The coaches in my league voted not to use the newer TDQ because it was unfair to those who have used the older standard tudor/ miggle QB's all the time. So we only use the standard QB's for league games and that can be a challenge.

Please explain the TDQ vs the TTQB issue further. How is it unfair?


Geno H
__________________
Proud MFCA member #22
Visit G-FORCE @ www.gforcetdq.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-14-2010, 10:49 PM
Shabby J's Avatar
Shabby J Shabby J is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Orange County , CA
Posts: 2,055
Default

__________________
Coach Shabby J - MFCA Pacific West Region Rep
Casciolini & Luffeigh, Inc.

Los Angeles...making EF history for over a decade.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-15-2010, 12:16 AM
wayneinsf's Avatar
wayneinsf wayneinsf is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 62
Default TDQ vs TTQB

"Please explain the TDQ vs the TTQB issue further. How is it unfair?"
Since we first started playing in the 70's we only used the TTQB's and when I tried to introduce the TDQ's late last year a majority of the coaches voted to use the older TTQB instead. Most said that the new TDQ made passing too easy and preferred the challenge of passing with the older TTQB.
I now have a righty and lefty TDQ that I can only use in practice.
Nothing wrong with the product I bought two last year and it's more of a preference thing.
__________________
Big Hap in Oak- Town by way of Chi- Town


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-15-2010, 12:25 AM
Geno H's Avatar
Geno H Geno H is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Raymond Kansas
Posts: 1,400
Default




Thanks for the explanation Wayne.
One more question though........Can you use 1st,2nd,3rd or 4a run Proline bases even though they are better than the other bases?

Geno H
__________________
Proud MFCA member #22
Visit G-FORCE @ www.gforcetdq.com

Last edited by Geno H : 10-15-2010 at 12:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-15-2010, 02:25 AM
FrustratedFinFan FrustratedFinFan is offline
Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Posts: 395
Default

I use the TDQ and have done so for the last two years. While it has helped improve my passing...and is a good fit for me....I led the CBSMF in INT's as well as attempts. Many coaches are better passers than me with their TTQB's and although the TDQ is allowed to be used by anyone out here in the LAEFL, I am the only one who uses it. I have no idea how that makes the TDQ unfair. In fact, all it did was make it possible for me to compete on a more even footing with my opposition. It is available to any coach that wants to buy it....just like 1st run Prolines and many other rare and expensive EF toys.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-15-2010, 03:37 AM
Pirate Rick's Avatar
Pirate Rick Pirate Rick is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: north hills ca
Posts: 920
Default

my only grip with the TDQ QB is in the way it stand to throw...the way the arm is positioned.. ( the TTQB has its arm to the back of the figure. the TDQs is in the front) intentional or not allows the user to lean that thing almost 3 yard past the line of scrimmage before he throws the ball.... i have played against it and had passes completed against me because of that fact. with the normal ttqb they would not have been able to have thrown the pass. its just a long lanky thing that gives the user a slight advantage in being able to just lean over the defense and fire away....and we use hand up linemen.

but thats just my opinion... no knock on the product or the users..to each there own.
__________________
"AHHHH...But you have heard of me"....

Last edited by Pirate Rick : 10-15-2010 at 03:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.