![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Fellas,
The weight of your figures only matters when your playing in various leagues and tournament settings. There's nothing wrong with 3.2 if you like it! It's all good! However, with the expansion, creativity and experimentation the weight of our players increase. The speed of the board increases. The stlyes of play varies. There are som many ways to play this thing/1 there's no one right way to play. It's all up to you. Do what you like. I like stock figures on some speed bases. Give me some strength up front and a big board and I'm in it for the fun of it because I'm not wining a Got dizit dang! I'm busting belts,rings trophies, plaques anything I can get my hands on. Hey does anybody know if O.J. is still selling stuff? ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I am all for progress but we have to be careful not to discourage the ones that we are trying to attract. I know that I am frustrated at times as I try to build a team to compete in leagues that I am not competitive. You can't use older figures because the newer ones are bigger and heavier. Don't even get me started on bases. We are asking a lot of coaches if they have to continue to build new teams all of the time in order to compete any time that there is a move to increase size or weight. I know that there are many dedicated coaches who have the time, energy, money and talent to change their teams anytime that they want. There are many more coaches who more than likely don't get involved because if you don't keep up you could easily fall behind and get left behind.
I understand that guys with companies that sell figures want to encourage change. I think that change can be good and add new energy to the hobby. If it ain't broke don't fix it. There are great leagues that are happy with what they are doing. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I havent read the entire thread but at the Texas Shootout last year all but two players on my team were 3.2. I played Beenutt and he tied me on the last play of the game. He ran 4.0. I lost my games due to being out coached. I doubt anyone noticed that my figures were 3.2 and if they did they didn't say anything. My lines were tweaked by Norbert and in some cases they matched up or pushed the opponent...now if my coaching matched my players base ability I might have something
![]() Good discussion from what i have read so far...hope it didn't go sour anywhere.
__________________
EM-F-er [ěm -f-er] –noun-abr-slang: Electric Miniature Footballer 1. a person/hobbyist/gamer who creates a representation of American Football in a small or reduced scale for competition or show. 2. the majority of forum users on the website, www.miniaturefootball.org —Idiom 3. One Bad Em-F-er, negative shout out; pertaining to weirdwolf: There goes one bad EM-F-er. I mean he can’t play and ain’t never win nothin’! |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I am going to do for you what you did for me. And thank you for the encouragement!
Don't let these "MF" warriors fool you! Knowing Norbert, Treks, and RJ personally, these guys rank among some of the most open-minded guys in the game, just proud of their leagues and styles of play. Everybody knows by now I love what the Great Lakes does. I think those guys are terrific up there. You've go old war horses like Jamel Goodloe, Jim Davis, and Ken Allen to name a few and the magic of "Norby 89", one of the most passionate guys in the game. Then you got RJ, LA's finest and now Dallas's own all with interesting views on the game. You got Mantaray 'Dre, always the promoter of the game and always seeking the truth, discussing some friendly miniature football. Then you got ERob coming from LA with the boil base spin on things and thus a combustible discussion starts! Sometimes, even in these discussions, something good can come of it. There is sometimes a silver lining in the discussions that you may pull out of it. Don't be discouraged by the knowledge, banter, and passionate that these gentlemen argue. Speak your opinions on things. I find you to be very wise and appreciative of the game. We all need more perspective instead of you just being a guy on the sidelines not voicing your opinions. Just my take, Reg |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() You know, who's right? Whos Wrong? Everyone is right....Sure I like the 4.0 guys but I dont dislike the 3.2 rule. Everyones leauge is what it is, and what they make it...and that would be right. I think the players move faster at 4.0 but I still think players move fast at 3.2. The main reason that I like the bigger figures is because that it gives you more of a choice....I love custom figures, and I love what everyone is doing to get the hobby out in the public....It was because I feel upon Reg's page that I got back in the hobby after a 25 year lay off. I'm not knocking the fab five but they bored me.....I do like the customs that are 3.2 or smaller as well.....Anyway, point is...no one is right or wrong...Doesnt matter who you are or what leauge you're in...your RIGHT!!! 3.2 - 4.0....just numbers.....
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The reason that we employ 3.2 is that most new members are not looking to customize or spend heavily. They ease into the hobby. I do remember, when the bases were made with cheaper and cheaper plastic, that we added weight to make out teams run smoother. So I really understand the difference.
Boiling bases is another choice we work around because people got tired of the awful smell, short shelf life during boiling. Add the fact that tweaking is just as effective with longer lasting results, then you have our position. I'm not knocking no ones preferences but we leave no coach behind. The numbers speak for themselves. And we customize! |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If tweaking is just as effective wilth longer lasting results then, why is boiling so tabu? I don't know about others, but I still have to tweak my bases after boiling them. I am not familiar with an overwhelming bad smell associated with boild bases. Other than the smell, I would think that boiling would be up to each individual coach. Also, I'm just an advocate of not banning a particular practice just because I don't like it or use it. I think each coach should be able to utilize his strengths as long as it is within the rule set. I used to boil for power and strength, but with the advent of new equipment, I more so boil for speed and smoother running men. Ken, you and many others witnessed me tweaking a unboiled proline, and making it stronger than one of my strongest boiled players at the convention in Chicago, when the Prolines first came out (Klingbeil asked how did u do that, & I gave a demo). That is why you would be suprised to find out which positions have boild bases on my squad. I feel you on some of the pains, trials, and tribulations of trying to boil for strength. I have purchased up to 10 packs of bases to find 3 out of 222 to make the Offensive/Defensive Line, LB or TE. Far too much work. In building my teams today, I find maybe 45%-50% of them to have boiled bases on them. I just don't want to loose the option.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The thing is it is not just weight that wins games.It is also coaching and talent per team.rjackson I would take Norbort,JIM Davis and Ken Allens 3.2 against your 4.0 team any day.Those three are the strongest but best skill teams around.They are all very skilled and good coached teams.
I do still like the 3.2 myself but do think that most leagues and tourrneys are opening up to new products and is great.I will just play with the rules per each game and bring what I got.
__________________
So what I like to run 5 wide.What you gonna do about it. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Bring your 4.0 team, we can have a nice little quiet game alone in my room, remember youngfella, all 3.2 teams are not the same.
Wally, nobodys upset or over reacting my friend, I love both, and to be honest, our own 4.0 league itself starts in 2 months, I'm in the beginning stages of building them now. After reading here and in different post that 4.0 and higher weights run better, I just wanted to show that 3.2 is a beautiful weight to play also, thats all, either or is fine. Norbert Revels Thee,......32 Counter Trap
__________________
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Great to put a face to the name. You hit it on the head. In a competitive league, like our season two, not only did people boil for strength here was the number difference:
Jets Avg Weight 5.6 Giants Avg. Weight 3.4 Now, the coach ran a snow job and he was declared the winner for two reasons: 1. We said boiled 2. The disparity wasn't addressed early enough. I beat the guy earlier in the season so he went back and got bigger, right after a trip to the West Coast. What I know really happened was this guy had connections and had large molds made of his best bases. The plastic from several bases was boiled into one. I swear his base reeds were as strong as a normal base. I am still ********ed because it ruined my perfect season. However, by tweaking standard bases you can still get the "boil" effect without the boil. Our philosophy is based on lessons we learn in a highly competitive environment. Therefore, tweaking stock and making weigh assures that the best coach wins. Mark played in our league this year, for a minute. Hope to see you at the convention. Last edited by sweetka : 01-17-2008 at 05:54 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|