![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() WHAT SYSTEM?....THIS YEAR WAS THE FIRST YEAR HE HAD ANY WIDE RECEIVERS...AND HE PUT HIS BEST NUMBERS EVER.....HE HAD MEDIOCRE RECEIVERS AT BEST PRIOR TO THIS YEAR......
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead, where there is no path and leave a trail." http://www.leaguelineup.com/welcome.asp?url=bamfl |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The greatest of all time, Dan Fouts!
Chargers Baby!!!!!
__________________
Coach Shabby J - MFCA Pacific West Region Rep Casciolini & Luffeigh, Inc. Los Angeles...making EF history for over a decade. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() No way he can even be considered, in college he was bringing drew henson water, (Henson was a underclassmen) if henson picked football instead of baseball, you cats would be talking about him, he was a god, perfect size and power, with the mindset to play without allstars around him, sure brady has rings, thats awesome, but when picking the best alltime, you can't go by rings, I would take marino over brady anyday, Marino on the patriots, WOWWWWWWWWWWWW, 10 rings easy.
Not in order 1. Marino 2. Unitas 3. Starr 4. Staubach 5. Elway 6. favre 7. Montana
__________________
Last edited by Norbert Revels : 03-04-2008 at 11:02 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Too much emphasis is put on championships. Winning a championship is done as a team. Brady is a better quarterback than Eli Manning, but the Giants won. Can't win a ring without a complete team. Marino didn't have the support that Brady, Favre, Montana had. Brady hasn't played long enough to even be considered. Remember, Brady is playing in an era where the defense can't be within 5 yards of the receiver or it's a penalty, or the receiver can knock the defender to the turf then catch the pass. Brady has had a few good years, but what if he sucks the next few? Is he still gonna be on the list? Just my 2 cents, or am I overvalueing my opinion?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|