New football formation, 2 QB's

Shabby, don't worry, it can only be used in NCAA on 3rd and very long situations. I'm curious as to the specific verbage the NCAA uses vs. the HS level to prevent this.

I wouldn't be so harsh, it was a brilliant way to overcome bigger, stronger teams ala App. St. vs. Michigan or even boiled bases vs. out of the bag. Yeah, I went there! NOTE: BEFORE ANYBODY GETS THEIR PANTIES IN A WAD....I've been there done that, so if you haven't, please refrain from replying because slamming boiling WAS NOT the point!!!

After doing some HEAVY research on the topic, I found another source that's not affiliated with the purchase of the system.

http://swsentinel.blogspot.com/2007/...1-offense.html

GOOD STUFF! Even Refs fight and argue over certain topics!!!

http://forum.officiating.com/showthr...t=39748&page=2

[Shabby J]

Jimbo, I guess I am too "old school" to wrap my mind around this. I do respect your opinion though and thanks for the caveat about the "boiled Base" comment.

That seems to be a a topic that brings a knee jerk reaction from a lot of people.

Let's not go there on this post please, I agree.

Here's another example: untweaked, out of the bag standard rookies vs. tweaked TTCs.

It is a hard concept to fathom. Even the Refs are yelling "heresy!" I'm only on post #30, but they are raising Cain over the subject.

LSU back in the mid to late 70''s ran an offense featuring 2 QBs in the
backfield. The only difference one of the QBs would lineup under
center the other at a tailback position whether in a full house
backfield or two man set. Off the pitch or handoff the other QB has
the option to run or pass. If you ran a veer the QB if he kept the ball
could take a step past where the FB ran through the line then follow
the FB. It forces the defense to cover more ground and less aggressive.