ALL COACHES: WHO'S BETTER

[mantaraydre]

ALL COACHES


Plain and simple, who's better at the position. THE TALL or the small ?


Who would you rather have on your team at wide receiver


THE TALL - RANDY MOSS, LARRY FITZGERALD, PLAXICO BURRESS , KEYSHAWN JOHNSON TYPE

OR


the small - steve smith, wes welker, torry holt, marvin harrison type.

***NO MIXING AND MATCHING, JUST PICK ONE OR THE OTHER YOU WOULD TAKE FIRST ON YOUR TEAM AND WHY.


I must go with the small. Steve smith is the ideal receiver to me. The small super fast elusive guy finding small spaces on the field to get into and receive the ball. My favorite receiver ever is the great STANLEY MORGAN, he was that fast scoot down field type of receiver.

Also, all you guy's that play with a ttqb, does it matter what size you WR'S to hit a pass. For example, there is much more of a target to hit wiitth a ff.net receiver as opposed to a haiti repro. Just wondering if it made any difference to you guy's.

ff.net figure : The larry fitzgerald type

haiti repro : The steve smith type

*** ALL MY RECEIVERS ON MY MPFL (BRONCO) TEAM WILL BE FF.NET FIGURES

**THIS CAN BE A FUN CONVERSTION IF MANY REPLIED IN DETAIL


THANX
MANTARAYDRE

[mantaraydre]

Coaches,


Im asking because the dolphuins took a big tall receiver out of somewhere and skipped over some olf the great ones in the draft. As my foot was headed for the television the analysis said maybe that big receiver fits what the dolphins are trying to do., maybe he was drafted for a certain role. They took him over inglesias of oklahoma.DIDN'T OKLAHOMA SCORE 60 POINTS PLUS 5 GAMES IN A ROW. Inglesias had something to do with that.

thanx
mantaraydre

[RavennaAl]

Tall or small, it don't matter. What you need is hands! I'm taking this guy in the first round....

Originally Posted by MANTARAY- DRE

Coaches,


Im asking because the dolphuins took a big tall receiver out of somewhere and skipped over some olf the great ones in the draft. As my foot was headed for the television the analysis said maybe that big receiver fits what the dolphins are trying to do., maybe he was drafted for a certain role. They took him over inglesias of oklahoma.DIDN'T OKLAHOMA SCORE 60 POINTS PLUS 5 GAMES IN A ROW. Inglesias had something to do with that.

thanx
mantaraydre

Inglesias isn't much of a burner. He could be a product of the system, Oklahoma did have a lot of talent.

With that being said, big play ability and a tall receiver probably has more potential. Though we know that doesn't always work.

Lastly, fits well within what Miami might want to do could be why. Like how Al Davis goes for the big tall, super fast receiver over a more sure thing. (probably why Oakland is where they're at )

[FrustratedFinFan]

As a Dolphins fan, I would have preferred Iglesias. That guy just gets it done! He was a huge factor for Oklahoma...and made big plays against good opposition. I don't dislike Turner....and I think he was picked to be a red zone target and to get the tough grabs over the middle....so, the Dolphins' staff has their reasons....but I think Iglesias would have had a bigger impact for us. He is all about the intangibles...he has a ton of heart and is a real warrior....would have loved to see him as a Dolphin.

[styx]

i will always take a small reciever over a tall anyday , its not the physical size of the reciever , its how big of a heart he has, by his drive,and through out the nfl it has alwalys been a small reciver that has ruled.