MFCA business meeting agenda item-MFCA NATIONAL LEAGUE

[ChetDakota]

Originally Posted by WEIRDWOLF

Bumping this back up for more discussion.
It seems like the main sticky point for this to happen is what rules set will be used to determine the overall winner.

I personally like the idea of honoring our past with the championship game being played under a updated, faster paced version of the original Tudor Rules (Tudor 2010 Rules). That way, no matter how you got to the championship game you will need to win it with what was the foundatiion to all rules sets in existence. (Honor thy Father and Thy Mother (Tudor))

Equipment would have to be discussed but what about that idea?

This is the way that it should be in my humble opinion.

As for equipment, You will have to set a weight limit and template size for figures. My suggestion would be 4.0 or 4.1 since most customized figures with a base will not make 3.3. As someone mentioned, it would be easier to add weight than take it off.

I would also propose that the figure height and width not exceed the Tudor/Miggle LB figure.

[Coach K-LO]

Originally Posted by WEIRDWOLF

Bumping this back up for more discussion.
It seems like the main sticky point for this to happen is what rules set will be used to determine the overall winner.

I personally like the idea of honoring our past with the championship game being played under a updated, faster paced version of the original Tudor Rules (Tudor 2010 Rules). That way, no matter how you got to the championship game you will need to win it with what was the foundatiion to all rules sets in existence. (Honor thy Father and Thy Mother (Tudor))

Equipment would have to be discussed but what about that idea?

okay if we go with "tudor 2010" would it play like Miggle?? I think it could be based on participation or weight class as to which rule set.

as for the weight class, think it should be two
- 3.3 (where most everyone has a team right now)
- 4.0/4.1 max (anything up to that.)

k-lo