Miniature Football Home  

Go Back   Miniature Electric Football Forums > Miniature Electric Football Tailgate Party
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2008, 02:17 AM
Biglock
 
Posts: n/a
Default Weight 3.2,4.0 or unlimited, which do u prefer?

Hey my EF/MF brethren
I have been blessed to be exposed to a few things in the hobby as far as figure weight goes, in the first brawl 3.2 was the rule I had fun getting in there and rumbling. When I went to Texas I was exposed to 4.0 and the advantages at playing at that weight, ive dabbled in Anthony Burgess's MPFL style when he first put the system together so I understand the advantages of playing at the unlimited weight, The most astonishing though was my man Bret Johnson my hometown brother who when playing with his good buddy Herb Smith use House Paint dipped players bulked up beyond belief, with bases that could push a Sherman Tank, the question guys is what weight works for you?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:52 AM
HOOP's Avatar
HOOP HOOP is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WHITE PLAINS, NY
Posts: 1,791
Default Well

I have been preparing for the BAM @4.0 and i love the consistency of the ride along the board by my guys. i havent noticed a change in strength of one base to another, speaking ofcourse, pound for pound. i havent found it difficult to get the weight up either. NOW, i have yet to actually play someone else at this weight, but so far, i like this much better than 3.2.
just my take.
i remember this question from the miggle board, so to quote my man Shabby J "Hold on to your hats, this is about to get good ".





ps- but i am glad BigLock that you posted this. it will be very interesting to see the public opinion this time around as oppossed to the miggle board debate, now that many more coaches have been exposed or experienced 4.0.


ENJOY YOUR MF FRIDAY FELLAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SCOTT
__________________
Does my post promote miniature football in a positive or fun way?
Does my post positively support my league, my fellow coaches and the hobby?
Does my post show to others my good fellowship and strong integrity?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:42 AM
Reginald Rutledge's Avatar
Reginald Rutledge Reginald Rutledge is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 4,699
Default 4.0

4.0 grams
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2008, 09:42 AM
Electric Coach's Avatar
Electric Coach Electric Coach is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Baltimore County
Posts: 585
Default Varied Weights

I prefer a range of weights because after I customize, my players vary in weight. I don’t shave or hollow out any of my players. I also do not add excessive coats of paint on my players. Whatever the weight of a particular player is after it is complete, that is the weight at which it will play. The heaviest player that I have is 4.0g. The lightest player is 3.0g.

Maurice

The Electric Coach
__________________
We are all ambassadors of the hobby. How we present the hobby, is a reflection on all who participate in it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2008, 01:52 PM
jeff's Avatar
jeff jeff is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 3,673
Default

We play 3.5 in the M.O.M.F.L. , and are thinking of raising it to 4.0 for the next season.
__________________
MID - OHIO WEBSITE
League play starts fall of 2010
http://midohiomfl.webs.com/
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2008, 02:48 PM
WEIRDWOLF's Avatar
WEIRDWOLF WEIRDWOLF is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Parkville, MO
Posts: 3,668
Default

I am leaning more and more toward 4.0 as a maximum weight for the simple reason that you can run the board at a higher speed and the men are more stable but I do believe that 3.3 has its place also. I would like to see national standards in place that would have leagues classified into different weigth catagories rather then being all over the board with weigths. Trains have HO, O, N scale. Boxers have different weight brackets. We should to. This is what I would recommend.

3.3 maximum and under
4.0 maximum and under
Unlimited
__________________
EM-F-er [ěm -f-er] –noun-abr-slang: Electric Miniature Footballer
1. a person/hobbyist/gamer who creates a representation of American Football in a small or reduced scale for competition or show.
2. the majority of forum users on the website, www.miniaturefootball.org

—Idiom
3. One Bad Em-F-er, negative shout out; pertaining to weirdwolf: There goes one bad EM-F-er. I mean he can’t play and ain’t never win nothin’!

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2008, 04:43 PM
daghstrydr's Avatar
daghstrydr daghstrydr is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DeepSouth
Posts: 780
Default

From playing with both 3.2 and 4.0 I really like them both. Until all tourney are under the 4.0 rule, you need to have both ready. Like I said, like them both but would rather it be 4.0.

Leonard

PS, Lock love the logo
__________________


Each One Teach One!
DSEFL
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2008, 07:44 PM
jhpr3 jhpr3 is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: san antonio tx
Posts: 110
Talking 4.0

4.0 the players seem to run better
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-09-2008, 08:41 PM
warriorman's Avatar
warriorman warriorman is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Elizabeth City
Posts: 234
Default Weight

Even though I'm not in a league and have yet to play in a tournament I agree with Weirdwolf's idea. In youth football you have different weight classes as well. Guys , think about it . Good idea Weirdwolf !

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-09-2008, 11:35 PM
andre kc andre kc is offline
Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 153
Default

I like 3.2
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.