Miniature Football Home  

Go Back   Miniature Electric Football Forums > Miniature Electric Football Tailgate Party
FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-25-2008, 06:54 AM
Reginald Rutledge's Avatar
Reginald Rutledge Reginald Rutledge is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 4,699
Default The Injury to the QB

In the DFW League, championships have been won and lost based on an injury to the starting quarterback. In the early years of Michael Robertson's development, one of the DFW finest champions and HOF inductees, we played a playoff game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Denver Broncos. Michael's starting quarterback, John Elway, went down in the first quarter. With him going down to an injury, meaning all quarterbacks considered Elway whether it was the mobile, stationary, or TTQB, a devastating blow had been handed to the Broncos championship dreams.

As the game progress, I saw that Mike had no confidence in his second-string QB, which was Bubby Brister. He would put in the TTQB Brister on passing situations and either throw and incompletion or interception. I would began to stack 9 in the box to stop the run. Mike had no solution for this on that day. History tells us he recovered in years after to remain one of the dominate coaches in DFW history.

Today we are faced with various rule changes in the DFW. A twist to a rule up for debate involves the scramble rule. This is a landmark-type rule because it may alter the way the game is played. But the twist for me comes in the form of the severity of injury to the QB. Now, thanks to new member Mark Villanueva's foresight on increased severity to QBs on scrambles, this is a very interesting topic. We have debate on each side and it really involves trying to re-define whether you want the QB taking off and running.

The % are being worked out but the gist of the "twist" is that if a QB takes off and run, he should have a higher percentage chance of getting hurt. If he has that higher percentage of risk, the QB will think twice about letting him run the ball. Additionally, there is an argument about the % increasing against the defense if the QB runs out of bounds to escape injuries via personal fouls or something to that nature. That was introduced by Michael Robertson.

These are valid arguments and help improve the game. Do you think injuries should increase or penalties toward defenders should increase?

Reg
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-25-2008, 07:33 AM
ChetDakota's Avatar
ChetDakota ChetDakota is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 339
Default

So, you mean that if I have a TDQ (which I do), I have a have a separate TDQ for each QB on my roster in the CBSMF? And if my starting QB gets hurt, then I "lose" one of my TDQs, perhaps for the season? If so, I am not into that. I already have to build a new 4.0 team for the CBSMF and now I have to have a stock of $20 TDQ QBs in order to compete?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-25-2008, 07:54 AM
Treks1's Avatar
Treks1 Treks1 is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waterford, MI (the "W")
Posts: 1,236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChetDakota View Post
So, you mean that if I have a TDQ (which I do), I have a have a separate TDQ for each QB on my roster in the CBSMF? And if my starting QB gets hurt, then I "lose" one of my TDQs, perhaps for the season? If so, I am not into that. I already have to build a new 4.0 team for the CBSMF and now I have to have a stock of $20 TDQ QBs in order to compete?
Yep, what he said.
__________________
SPARTANS!!! WHAT IS YOUR OCUPATION?!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-25-2008, 08:47 AM
Reginald Rutledge's Avatar
Reginald Rutledge Reginald Rutledge is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 4,699
Default This is a DFW Specific Thing

ChetDakota,

I never said anything about the CBSMF. I was referencing the DFW League.

Reg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-25-2008, 08:50 AM
artlax's Avatar
artlax artlax is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Between the Catskills and the Hudson
Posts: 2,283
Default Reg

I did not realize that you had to designate a specific TTQB or TDQ to complement each QB you have on the roster. I assume that means they need to be numbered up as well? I guess I didn't see that in the rules and it was not mentioned at the BAM scrimmage last week.

RE: - The Scramble. I agree that the % for injury to QB should increase and the % of personal foul/late hit penalty for defense should also increase.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-25-2008, 09:18 AM
RPD's Avatar
RPD RPD is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: texas
Posts: 671
Default

QB's get hurt very often after QB sacks, therefore we should also alter the injury factor(increase probability of injury on a sack), so lets also increase the injury probability after all sacks. I don't like this rule proposal, I think the shootout system is fine the way it is, why are we trying to complicate things more than they already are. The rule set we have in place now is good, therefore if anything we should come up with a system that increases QB injury after QB sacks. QB's get hurt more often IMO due to sacks than due to scrambling out of the pocket, I.E. blindside hits, etc etc. Come on guys it sounds to me like you want to penalize the teams that incorporate the scrambling QB into their offensive scheme. Lets increase QB injuries on sacks instead that would sound more reallistic to me. Enough with all these proposed rule changes at this time of the year, we have 3 now, and lets get ready to rumble.
Attached Images
  
__________________
RD "RAIDERNATION" DFW-RAIDERS
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-25-2008, 09:39 AM
Geno H's Avatar
Geno H Geno H is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Raymond Kansas
Posts: 1,400
Default

I often here the that many do not like the passing sticks because it is a prop or crutch...I view the "action box" to be the exact same type of apparatus. I would hate to be beating my opponent in every facet of the game and then the dumb luck of shaking the box end a great drive or as the example given above you lose your TDQ for the game or season. Although this may be a part of real football we are playing Electric football. I dont find the strong desire as some do to totaly emulate real football. I for one find the outright luck of the action box my least favorite part of the shootout rules. Anyone that has played me under those rules knows I never have anyone shake the box. It is hard enough to have all things come together to accomplish a score to have "luck" take it away.

Geno H
__________________
Proud MFCA member #22
Visit G-FORCE @ www.gforcetdq.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-25-2008, 09:45 AM
mantaraydre's Avatar
mantaraydre mantaraydre is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 2,866
Default Primary Qb, Secondary Qb

ATT CHETDAKOTA



IN REGARDINGS TO QB'S GOING DOWN. jUST USE YOU TDQ AS A STARTING PRIMNARY QB. If he gets hurt, just have a few miggle white or yellow ttqb's as your backup. This works because during the course of a game i dont think the wear and tear on the miggle ttqb will start to show after 2 to three games. WHEN PRACTICING WITH THE TTQB, IT BREAKS DOWN FAST BECAUSE YOU ARE PASSING ALL OF THE TIME. During a game the ttqb gets a break when the defense is out there and when you are running the ball. You may just throw 15 to 20 passes per game.


IT SHOULD WORK OUT. "JUST BE AS DEADLY WITH THE TTQB AS YOU ARE WITH THE TDQ

PS/I HAVE 3 TDQ'S SO I HAVE A LITTLE CUSHION



MANTARAYDRE
__________________
IF YOU PASS WITH STICKS, YOU INCREASE THE LEVEL OF PICKS.

Last edited by mantaraydre : 07-25-2008 at 09:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-25-2008, 09:45 AM
dallcow4life28's Avatar
dallcow4life28 dallcow4life28 is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: georgia
Posts: 1,200
Default Geno,

I agree, totally. These so-called passing sticks and rolling the dice should be banned from the game. IMO it does not add the to realism, but takes away from the realism of the game. Self-passing is the future of the game, if integrated correctly. We are currently putting together a how-to video that will soon be posted on joxindabox.com
__________________
ANY TEAM-ANY YEAR!!! For custom painted teams and decals, visit http://www.joxindabox.net,

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-25-2008, 09:52 AM
mantaraydre's Avatar
mantaraydre mantaraydre is offline
MFCA MEMBER
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 2,866
Default What Is Self Passing

D-LIFE, WHAT'S HAPPENING


Im just curious, what exactly is self passing. When i was younger we had a league where you took the ball and threw with your own hand to hit the wr/rb. Is this what you are talking about. I actually loved when we did that.

let us know some details of this


mantaraydre
__________________
IF YOU PASS WITH STICKS, YOU INCREASE THE LEVEL OF PICKS.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.